SEMITECH
04·Tech note

Particle Size vs Matting Efficiency.

The d50 — median particle diameter — determines how far silica particles protrude above the film surface to scatter light and reduce gloss.

Why d50 Is the First Spec You Should Check

The d50 — median particle diameter — determines how far silica particles protrude above the film surface to scatter light and reduce gloss. A matting agent with a d50 of 5–6 µm performs optimally in 25–35 µm dry film thickness (DFT) coatings. If your DFT is only 15 µm but you specify a 10 µm d50 product, particles sit proud of the surface causing excessive roughness and poor feel without proportional gloss reduction.

The rule of thumb: target a d50 between 0.3× and 0.7× of your DFT. Below 0.3× the particles are buried and contribute almost nothing. Above 0.7× you get diminishing gloss returns with rising haze and surface defects. For thin-film systems under 20 µm, grades like GMATT 100 Series with d50 around 3–5 µm are the starting point.

d90 and Coarse-Tail Control: Where Defects Hide

The d90 — the diameter below which 90% of particles fall — reveals the coarse tail that causes surface defects. Two products can share a d50 of 6 µm yet behave very differently if one has a d90 of 10 µm and another 18 µm. The wider distribution scatters more coarse particles into the film surface, creating visible specks in clear coats and seed-like defects in pigmented systems.

For automotive and furniture clear coats, a d90/d50 ratio below 2.0 is considered tight. Precipitated silica grades (GMATT 600 Series) achieve ratios of 1.6–1.8, making them the default choice when transparency matters. Gel-process grades can run 2.5–3.0× unless jet-milled, and that coarse tail becomes a reject risk on high-gloss substrates.

Matching Particle Size to Film Thickness

Getting matting efficiency right means matching the silica grade to your actual DFT range — not the theoretical one on the TDS. In practice, spray application of a 30 µm nominal DFT produces 22–38 µm variation across the panel. Your matting agent must perform across that entire window.

A d50 of 5 µm covers the 20–35 µm DFT band reliably. For thicker industrial coatings at 40–60 µm DFT, move to 8–12 µm d50 grades. For thin wood sealers at 10–15 µm, use 2.5–4 µm grades. Mismatching by even one size bracket can swing gloss by 15–20 units at the same loading level — an expensive correction once production starts. See our guide on formulating by coating thickness for detailed loading tables.

The Transparency vs Efficiency Trade-Off

Smaller particles scatter less visible light and preserve film clarity, but require higher loading to achieve the same gloss target — typically 4–6% for a 3 µm grade versus 2–3% for a 7 µm grade to reach 30 GU at 60°. Every additional percent of loading raises raw material cost and can affect rheology, sag resistance, and recoat adhesion.

Surface treatment shifts this trade-off. Wax-treated silica (see our surface treatment guide) reduces the refractive index mismatch between particle and binder, preserving transparency at larger particle sizes. A 6 µm wax-treated grade can match the clarity of a 4 µm untreated grade at 30% lower loading — a real cost lever for formulators balancing aesthetics and economics.

Particle Size Specification Comparison

The table below compares typical particle size grades against target DFT ranges and expected matting performance at standard loading. Use this as a starting-point selection tool — actual gloss depends on binder type, application method, and cure conditions.

Grade Typed50 (µm)d90 (µm)Target DFT (µm)Gloss @ 3% Loading (60°)Best For
Fine precipitated3–45–710–2025–35 GUWood sealers, thin clear coats
Standard gel5–69–1225–3515–25 GUFurniture, general industrial
Coarse gel8–1014–1840–6010–20 GUHeavy industrial, floor coatings
Wax-treated5–68–1025–3520–30 GUHigh-transparency clear coats
Precipitated narrow-cut4–56–815–2520–30 GUAutomotive OEM, premium wood

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about technical knowledge.

+What is the ideal d50 for matting agents in thin coatings under 20 µm?

For coatings under 20 µm DFT, use matting agents with a d50 of 2.5–4 µm. This keeps particles within the 0.3–0.7× DFT ratio, ensuring they protrude enough for gloss reduction without causing excessive roughness or poor surface feel.

+How does d90 affect surface defects in clear coats?

A high d90 means more oversized particles that protrude above the film surface, creating visible specks and seed defects. For clear coat applications, target a d90/d50 ratio below 2.0 — precipitated silica grades typically achieve 1.6–1.8, making them preferred for defect-sensitive finishes.

+Why does the same matting agent give different gloss on different coating lines?

Gloss variation usually traces to DFT differences across application methods. A 5 µm d50 grade optimized for 30 µm DFT will under-perform at 18 µm (particles buried) or over-matt at 45 µm. Measure actual DFT on your line before adjusting loading.

+Does smaller particle size always mean better transparency?

Smaller particles do scatter less visible light, preserving clarity. However, they require higher loading (4–6% vs 2–3%) to reach the same gloss target, which increases cost and can affect rheology. Wax-treated larger particles often achieve equivalent transparency at lower loading.

+What particle size should I use for 40–60 µm industrial coatings?

Use matting agents with a d50 of 8–12 µm for heavy industrial coatings at 40–60 µm DFT. Finer grades get buried in thick films and waste loading. Coarse gel-process silica in this size range delivers reliable matting at 2–4% addition levels.

+How does surface treatment change the particle size selection?

Wax or silicone surface treatments reduce the refractive index gap between silica and binder. This lets you use a larger d50 grade (e.g., 6 µm instead of 4 µm) while maintaining transparency — effectively cutting loading by 20–30% for the same gloss and clarity target.

Match your silica d50 to 0.3–0.7× of actual dry film thickness and keep the d90/d50 ratio below 2.0 — this two-number check eliminates most matting defects before lab work begins.

05 / Inquiry

Talk to a chemist about Particle Size vs Matting Efficiency.

Submit your formulation and target gloss specs. A SEMITECH engineer will recommend the grade and ship a lab sample.

Reply
24hrs
Sample
5days
Supply
15kMT/yr

Your information is used only to respond to your inquiry and will not be shared.

TelegramWhatsApp